[Bug tree-optimization/113281] [14 Regression] Wrong code due to vectorization of shift reduction and missing promotions since r14-3027

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281

--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> a >= 16 ? 0 : 32872 >> MIN (a, 15) (the MIN is still required to
> avoid requiring masking).

Note maybe instead of MIN here we use `a & 0xf` since that will more likely be
cheaper than a MIN.