https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97119
--- Comment #10 from Ali Bahrami <ali_gccbugzilla at emvision dot com> --- > I think the issue described here are all covered by pr 63572 Can you explain how? I might not have followed it, but pr 63572 seems to revolve around generating correct DWARF content? Here, we're not reading the DWARF at all, so its correctness isn't a factor. We're not really making any claims about gcc correctness. The problem here is that what these optimizations do cause us difficulties in our simple mapping of addresses to names, while the optimizations themselves don't have enough impact to fight for. Hence, we'd like the option to opt out. - Ali
