https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94083
Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment #4 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Shall __builtin_isinf (x) or __builtin_isinf_sign (x) raise exception if x
> is a sNaN?
> Or never? Or it can but doesn't have to?
Never.
See also bug #66462 which also has a not-quite-right patch that was committed
and reverted, and the fixed patch posted but never committed and then
forgotten. I'm not 100% sure of the impact of that patch on soft-float but at a
quick glance it seems to use bitwise integer arithmetic which should avoid
libcalls entirely.
