https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114157

--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d2bc5def30830e685ae2e3c2f4d07b967e2be63

commit r14-9314-g9d2bc5def30830e685ae2e3c2f4d07b967e2be63
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 5 10:27:14 2024 +0100

    bitint: Handle BIT_FIELD_REF lowering [PR114157]

    The following patch adds support for BIT_FIELD_REF lowering with
    large/huge _BitInt lhs.  BIT_FIELD_REF requires mode argument first
    operand, so the operand shouldn't be any huge _BitInt.
    If we only access limbs from inside of BIT_FIELD_REF using constant
    indexes, we can just create a new BIT_FIELD_REF to extract the limb,
    but if we need to use variable index in a loop, I'm afraid we need
    to spill it into memory, which is what the following patch does.
    If there is some bitwise type for the extraction, it extracts just
    what we need and not more than that, otherwise it spills the whole
    first argument of BIT_FIELD_REF and uses MEM_REF with an offset
    with VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR around it.

    2024-03-05  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

            PR middle-end/114157
            * gimple-lower-bitint.cc: Include stor-layout.h.
            (mergeable_op): Return true for BIT_FIELD_REF.
            (struct bitint_large_huge): Declare handle_bit_field_ref method.
            (bitint_large_huge::handle_bit_field_ref): New method.
            (bitint_large_huge::handle_stmt): Use it for BIT_FIELD_REF.

            * gcc.dg/bitint-98.c: New test.
            * gcc.target/i386/avx2-pr114157.c: New test.
            * gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr114157.c: New test.

Reply via email to