https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #8 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- No fallout on x86 or aarch64. Of course using false instead of TYPE_SIGN (utype) is also possible and maybe clearer?
rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:12:07 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #8 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- No fallout on x86 or aarch64. Of course using false instead of TYPE_SIGN (utype) is also possible and maybe clearer?