https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20357
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Just for reference here is the ICE that is produced:
```
<source>:10:1: error: Two symbols with same comdat_group are not linked by the
same_comdat_group list.
10 | }
| ^
_ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC1Ev/8 (X<f>::X() [with void (* f)() = f])
Type: function definition analyzed alias cpp_implicit_alias
Visibility: semantic_interposition public weak comdat
comdat_group:_ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC5Ev one_only
Same comdat group as: _ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC2Ev/7
previous sharing asm name: 5
References: _ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC2Ev/7 (alias)
Referring:
Function flags:
Called by: main/2
Calls:
_ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC1Ev/5 (X<f>::X() [with void (* f)() = f])
Type: function definition analyzed alias cpp_implicit_alias
Visibility: semantic_interposition public weak comdat
comdat_group:_ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC5Ev one_only
Same comdat group as: _ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC2Ev/4
next sharing asm name: 8
References: _ZN1XIXadL_Z1fvEEEC2Ev/4 (alias)
Referring:
Function flags:
Called by: _Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0v/9
Calls:
```
