https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #33 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #30) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #29) > > Might be for \r\n line endings? > > New lines are handled slightly differently – and \f and \v don't seem to be > handled at all. > > Comparing the result with ifort/ifx/flang, they handle a bare '\r' (in > contrast to \r\n) at fewer places than gfortran – albeit from the code it > looks as if a \r not followed by \n is not handled consistently either. > --- snip --- Initially we primarily handled /n and I recall having to do a number of places to take care of the \r\n because Microsoft allegedly chose to not follow the standards of the day and did the \r/\n. One can argue about that since some of the old teletypes needed the \n to roll the paper after the carriage return. ;) We have never done anything with \f or \v .
