https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95682
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Adding some printout after initializing the t1%x(:),
>
> do i = 1, size(t1%x)
> print *, len_trim (t1%x(i)), t1%x(i)
> end do
>
> I get for gcc-8:
>
> 5 three
> 5 three
> 5 three
>
> and for 9,10,11:
>
> 3 one
> 3 two
> 5 three
>
> That's not a typical regression, but rather wrong code replaced by other
> wrong
> code.
Since this was not really a regression, as you remark, and the testcase works
correctly from 12-branch through mainline, I am closing as a WONTFIX.
Paul
