https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114801
--- Comment #22 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Sure, that's what I'm worried about. So we can: - leave this as-is for gcc-14 (known bug) - commit what we discussed in #c15 #c16, (with an improved testcase as you mentioned on the list,) thus at least temporarily forcing canonicalization (preventing users from using 'weird' values) - possibly revisit this for gcc-15 by handling predicates differently
