https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2024-05-15
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #5)
> I suppose Richard should have known the issue.
> See: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2024-May/079828.html
Yep, this and others were the reason the change was reverted against the
authors wish for GCC 14 but I promised to re-instantiate in stage1. That
means it's Segher who's intending to fix this and the rest of the fallout
in a more appropriate way that wasn't suitable for late stage4.
But confirmed, I also see this.
