https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99531
Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #5)
> The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
> <vmaka...@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7acb6dca941db2b1c135107dac3a34a20650d5c
>
> commit r12-5944-ga7acb6dca941db2b1c135107dac3a34a20650d5c
> Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon Dec 13 13:48:12 2021 -0500
>
> [PR99531] Modify pseudo class cost calculation when processing move
> involving the pseudo and a hard register
>
> Pseudo class calculated on the 1st iteration should not have a
> special treatment in cost calculation when processing move involving
> the pseudo and a hard register.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/99531
> * ira-costs.c (record_operand_costs): Do not take pseudo class
> calculated on the 1st iteration into account when processing move
> involving the pseudo and a hard register.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/99531
> * gcc.target/i386/pr99531.c: New test.
This caused PR 115148
