https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115482
--- Comment #2 from dv at vollmann dot ch --- On 6/14/24 11:54, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115482 > > Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Last reconfirmed| |2024-06-14 > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > The change seems reasonable, but I should probably just add a proper check for > isatty, instead of assuming that it will exist in <unistd.h> if we have that > header. I agree, my diff is a workaround, I don't consider it a proper fix. _GLIBCPP_HAVE_ISATTY was removed in 2003... Detlef
