https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115508

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
  _19 = BIT_FIELD_REF <vec_var.1_14, 64, 0>;
  _12 = BIT_FIELD_REF <vec_var.1_14, 64, 64>;
  _15 = _12 | _19;

vs
  _13 = BIT_FIELD_REF <vec_var.1_12, 64, 0>;
  _14 = BIT_FIELD_REF <vec_var.1_12, 64, 64>;
  _15 = _13 | _14;

So basically it is just by accident the order happens that way which is why the
reducing it further removing the stuff afterwards does not make any difference
...

Reply via email to