https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115534
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I suspect there is a dup of this already. See the bug which I made this one > blocking for a list of related bugs. Most of the other bugs relate to the argument expansions, however this one, regardless of the expansion itself shouldn't need the intermediate stack. I think there are various other ways the operation could have been kept in a gimple register.
