https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115693
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Paulous Haile from comment #4) > Maybe not necessary, just wanted to add a case for the default operator==. I > have noticed it also doesn't seem to coalesce adjacent cmps, which I assume > is part of the same issue. That is PR 108953 already.
