https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990
--- Comment #7 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #5)
> >
> > Is this a C++ standard defect? There is no inline definition for classes and
> > templates that allow multiple definitions to be discarded in different
> > modules, just like "inline" does in the other translation units.
>
> In the testcase all definitions are attached to the global module because
> they precede any "export module" line, so the usual merging applies.
My question is that
//someheader.hpp
inline void foo() noexcept
{
//dosomethingheader
}
//bar.cppm
module;
#include<someheader.hpp>
export module bar;
export inline void foo() noexcept;
//main.cpp
Import bar;
#include<someheader.hpp>
Int main()
{
foo(); //which foo()? The foo in the header or the foo in the module?
}
