https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115741
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2024-07-02
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Target| |riscv
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Summary|[15] RISC-V: ICE in |[15 Regression] RISC-V: ICE
|vectorizable_load, at |in vectorizable_load, at
|tree-vect-stmts.cc:11524 |tree-vect-stmts.cc:11524
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm guessing you hit
/* For loop vectorization we now should have
an alternate type or LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS
set. */
if (loop_vinfo)
gcc_assert (new_vtype
|| LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS
(loop_vinfo));
it's always helpful to quote the line an assert happens on given it "moves" a
lot during development. I can reproduce it with a cross.
