https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115912
--- Comment #19 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 58688 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58688&action=edit pass_diff_31_32.txt.xz (In reply to Sam James from comment #18) > The first point of divergence seems to be: > [...] > i.e. arrayZ gets corrupted? This might be wrong, it looks like it's consistent at return for the first call to subset. (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #17) > If anything maybe something else afterwards (not ext-dce) optimizes something > incorrectly. Not sure how useful it is in this format, but here's the full dumps diff between 31 & 32.
