https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > The gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90 testcase is incredibly bad because it has so > many loops that are or are not vectorized. It should ideally be split up. > > But I think the blame is incorrect, the test uses > -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns and thus isn't effected by the rev in > question. Today I confirmed the git bisect by reverting commit c290e6a0b7a9 from today's trunk (commit 88d16194d0c8 at the time of my test), and observing that this makes gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90 pass again. The commit influences the testcase somehow. > As Andrew says the fix for the other regression is trivial, I'm leaving that > to ARM folks as an exercise. If that is the case, I will be happy to post a patch to the mailing list.
