https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608
--- Comment #21 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #20) > Hi Mikael, > > I did regression testing on x86_64 and AArch64 and only found one test-ism. > > I think I understand most of the patch to be able to deal with any fallout, > would it be ok if I fix the test-ism and submit the patch on your behalf? > > It would be a shame to let it bitrot. > Sorry. In the last days, I submitted a few small minloc-related patches found while working on this PR, and should be able to submit the first series (inline minloc without dim argument) this week. You can submit on my behalf if you prefer; it would definitely accelerate progress on this topic. What do you mean by test-ism?
