https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116455

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Libc++ does not define it as constexpr either.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/8e0b9c85924ca22a65d57988ea2c5c22a5181ed9/libcxx/include/__coroutine/noop_coroutine_handle.h#L91

So yes gcc is following the standard.

Reply via email to