https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org> --- Thank you for the explanation! I must confess that most of it went over my head... (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > So yes this is just a testcase issue. Just needs a small testcase change. > > I think s/lsls/lsl(s)/ and s/lsrs/lsr(s)/ will fix the issue. lsl(s) and lsr(s) didn't work, but lsls? and lsrs? did. Do you want me to send a patch or will you do it? I can copy and paste your explanation of what is going on and try to build a coherent commit message.
