https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116416
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Though, we clearly do that already for CALL_EXPRs to constexpr functions
> during cp_fold. So guess it is just TARGET_EXPRs or what exactly this
> testcase needs.
Yes, I think the point here is to turn e.g. this:
callback (TARGET_EXPR <D.2890, <<< Unknown tree: aggr_init_expr
5
__ct_comp
D.2890
(struct Str *) <<< Unknown tree: void_cst >>>
(const char *) "Test" >>>>)
into:
callback (TARGET_EXPR <D.2890, {.str=(const char *) "Test", .length=4}>)
