https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116799
--- Comment #4 from James McCoy <jamessan at jamessan dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to James McCoy from comment #2) > > My initial bisect pointed to that, but I was using the Vim test suite as the > > good/bad check. > > > > I'm rerunning now with just the minimal reproduction to double check the > > results. My re-run bisect (using "./configure --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap" this time) is now pointing to r14-2675-gef28aadad6e. > I think you misunderstood, what I am saying is the x86 and s390x has the > same IR at the point at expand and therefor the problem is not with the > commit for PR 111294 itself but it is exposing an issue with something > further along in the compiler. (hence calling it a latent bug). Thanks for the explanation. I appreciate the extra context, as someone that doesn't work on gcc.
