https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116887
--- Comment #12 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to chenglulu from comment #10) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #8) > > (In reply to chenglulu from comment #7) > > It seems like a previous attempt to fix PR 52999: r186919. But it was then > > reverted and changed to TARGET_SECTION_TYPE_FLAGS in r188031. > > > > So which is better? Maybe we'll need to dig some history from the mail > > list... > > > Comparison of the two assembly codes： > 1. Define the hook TARGET_SECTION_TYPE_FLAGS > la.local $r12,.LC0 > ldptr.d $r12,$r12,0 > bne $r13,$r12,.L3 > ... > jr $r1 > .cfi_endproc > .LFE0: > .size _dlfo_process_initial, .-_dlfo_process_initial > .section .data.rel.ro > .align 3 > .LC0: > .dword _rtld_global+2048 > > > 2 Another： > la.global $r14,_rtld_global > lu12i.w $r12,4096>>12 # 0x1000 > add.d $r12,$r14,$r12 > addi.d $r12,$r12,-2048 > bne $r13,$r12,.L3 Hmm I do think 2 is better. It seems we are just "reinventing" the GOT in 1. So OK with your approach if it passes regtest.
