https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116931
--- Comment #4 from Matt Bentley <mattreecebentley at gmail dot com> --- Okay, so that's a language defect, because const int * const isn't invalid, so neither should a typedef of the same.
mattreecebentley at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs Tue, 01 Oct 2024 17:59:18 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116931
--- Comment #4 from Matt Bentley <mattreecebentley at gmail dot com> --- Okay, so that's a language defect, because const int * const isn't invalid, so neither should a typedef of the same.