https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117141
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2024-10-14
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(match (signed_integer_sat_sub @0 @1)
(cond^ (ne (imagpart (IFN_SUB_OVERFLOW@2 @0 @1)) integer_zerop)
(bit_xor:c (negate (convert (lt @0 integer_zerop)))
max_value)
(realpart @2))
(if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
&& types_match (type, @0, @1))))
(match (signed_integer_sat_sub @0 @1)
(cond^ (ne (imagpart (IFN_SUB_OVERFLOW:c@2 @0 @1)) integer_zerop)
(bit_xor:c (nop_convert?
(negate (nop_convert? (convert (lt @0 integer_zerop)))))
max_value)
(realpart @2))
(if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
&& types_match (type, @0, @1))))
The difference is the second has a optional nop_convert which allows for the
first one.
I think the first one can be safely removed as the second one will match it
too.
So confirmed.