https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Yes but in this case the mask will 0 forcing it all to 0 . But the mask is
> swapping around to -1 for some reason.
Also if you are worried about that, you can do:
```
int a, b, c, d;
static int e[6]={0,0,0,0,0,0};
int main() {
for (d = 0; d < 6; d++)
if (!c)
e[d] = 0;
for (; b < 6; b++)
a = e[b];
if (a != 0)
__builtin_abort();
return 0;
}
```
And compile with `-O3 -fno-unswitch-loops -fallow-store-data-races` to have the
same issue.
