https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117320
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2024-10-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
.uleb128 0x5e # (DIE (0x22db0) DW_TAG_subprogram)
# DW_AT_external
.long .LASF1848 # DW_AT_name: "backtrace_function"
# DW_AT_decl_file (1, eval.c)
.byte 0x70 # DW_AT_decl_line
# DW_AT_decl_column (0x1)
# DW_AT_prototyped
.long 0x4d7 # DW_AT_type
# DW_AT_inline (0x1)
.long 0x22dcb # DW_AT_sibling
.uleb128 0x28 # (DIE (0x22dbe) DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
.ascii "pdl\0" # DW_AT_name
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file (eval.c)
.byte 0x70 # DW_AT_decl_line
.byte 0x28 # DW_AT_decl_column
.long 0x39ea # DW_AT_type
.byte 0 # end of children of DIE 0x22db0
.uleb128 0x3a # (DIE (0x22dcb) DW_TAG_subprogram)
.long .LASF1849 # DW_AT_name: "specpdl_arg"
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file (eval.c)
.byte 0x69 # DW_AT_decl_line
# DW_AT_decl_column (0x1)
# DW_AT_prototyped
.long 0x4d7 # DW_AT_type
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_inline
.long 0x22de8 # DW_AT_sibling
.uleb128 0x28 # (DIE (0x22ddb) DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
.ascii "pdl\0" # DW_AT_name
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file (eval.c)
.byte 0x69 # DW_AT_decl_line
.byte 0x21 # DW_AT_decl_column
.long 0x39ea # DW_AT_type
.byte 0 # end of children of DIE 0x22dcb
I think gdb is not handling the debug information correctly in an object file,
rather than gcc produce the wrong one.
Does it happen in a full linked binary or just in the object file?
0xa369 does not exist as part of the text sections .
I almost suspect GDB going wrong with the object file.
