https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|union not written to with |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
|particular layout |union not written to with
| |particular layout
Last reconfirmed| |2024-11-03
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
Before esra:
rv.DATA.var_0._1 = 2;
var7 = f2 (arg0_5(D));
rv.DATA.var_0._0 = var7;
D.2927 = rv;
After:
rv$DATA$var_0$_1_17 = 2;
var7 = f2 (arg0_5(D));
rv.DATA.var_0._0 = var7;
MEM <unsigned char> [(struct s2 *)&D.2927] = rv$DATA$var_0$_1_17;
MEM <long int> [(struct s2 *)&D.2927 + 8B] = rv$DATA$var_1$_1_18(D);
Notice var7 is not copied correctly.