https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117467
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
- 28.13% 28.04% 590285 f951 f951 [.]
bitmap_bit_p(bitmap_head const*, int) ▒
+ 8.28% _start
▒
- 2.79% gimple_simplify_PLUS_EXPR(gimple_match_op*, gimple**, tree_node*
(*)(tree_node*), code_helper, tree_node*, ▒
- 2.78% gimple_resimplify2(gimple**, gimple_match_op*, tree_node*
(*)(tree_node*)) ▒
- gimple_simplify_MULT_EXPR(gimple_match_op*, gimple**, tree_node*
(*)(tree_node*), code_helper, tree_node*, ▒
- 2.26% pta_valueize(tree_node*)
▒
range_query::value_of_expr(tree_node*, gimple*)
▒
+ gimple_ranger::range_of_expr(vrange&, tree_node*, gimple*)
▒
+ 2.36% gimple_ranger::range_of_stmt(vrange&, gimple*, tree_node*)
▒
+ 2.23% gimple_simplify_POINTER_PLUS_EXPR(gimple_match_op*, gimple**,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node*), code_helper, tree▒
+ 2.07% fold_using_range::fold_stmt(vrange&, gimple*, fur_source&,
tree_node*) ▒
+ 2.03% execute_ranger_vrp(function*, bool)
this seems in the end all related to prange and pta_valueize?
