------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:13 ------- I read through these patches a little.
I don't understand why ltmain.sh is the way it is, but Gary's comment seemed appropriate. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02333.html Doesn't the second patch eliminate the need for the first one? I still don't understand why the second patch is needed, though. To me it looks like libjava.exp:libjava_init initializes the various forms of LD_LIBRARY_PATH appropriately, finding libgcc_s.so. Can you tell me why this doesn't work? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17311
