------- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-10-11 23:45 -------
Not a big fan of Andrew's patch. I don't think it will cover all the cases where
we have a problem. Basically, afaict, we're folding the toplevel call into
something else. In this case a builtin_memcpy to the destination. Basically we
can't check if the toplevel function call has changed and then go on with our
lives since set_rhs deals with the ssa name.
Diego, I'm positive the bits that I did to builtins.c is correct, I'm not sure
that this workaround is correct, or that it won't involve quite a bit of
workaround in the ccp, can you take a look at this please?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17656
