------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-10-11 23:50 ------- > It would be list.... ugh. Damn that allocator rebinding! I'm developing severe > issues with this particular container. Well, this kills off this QoI > improvement. I've reverted this on mainline, and fixed up the testcases that > test for this to be of the type that showed this, more advanced, problem.
Many thanks. > I'm going to keep the infrastructure in __mt_alloc to do the actual > deallocations, however. At least, for the time being. Ok, but as long as we don't use that, let's avoid taking the lock a second time in _M_reserve_block, the new calls and so on... I propose to protect with macros or #if 0 or whatelse those snippets too. Thanks again. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17937
