------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 14:07
-------
Unless someone can prove that eh part of remove_useless_stmt does not matter any more
because of
the lowering of eh, I think the patch is wrong. Maybe we can move the eh part into
the lowering of the
eh and then we don't have to worry about that if we don't do it alreay.
Doing CFG already does the some parts of remove_useless_stmt and
cfg_remove_useless_stmt does the
conditional part already. I think eh lowering does the rest so maybe we can remove
this compile time
problem.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-14 14:07:16
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17967
