https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111053
Peter Dimov <pdimov at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pdimov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Peter Dimov <pdimov at gmail dot com> ---
Now I wonder whether replacing `std::ranges::copy(r, std::back_inserter(c))`
with `c.append_range(r)` is an allowed optimization, all things considered.
Unrelated to the above, one additional special case which `std::copy` has and
`std::ranges::copy` doesn't is dedicated support for contiguous iterators, as
pointed out in bug 118647.
