[Bug target/115910] [15 Regression] ((unsigned)x)/3 with a range for (unsigned)x that does not have the sign bit set seems to produce much worse code

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115910

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note, with the patch I see no testsuite differences on aarch64-linux,
powerpc64le-linux, s390x-linux and i686-linux and on x86_64-linux it fixes the
new test.