https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119766
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Simon Marchi <simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> In the dwarf 5 standard I read:
> ...
> F.2.3
> Contents of the Split DWARF Object Files
> The split DWARF object files each contain the following sections:
> .debug_abbrev.dwo
> .debug_info.dwo (for the compilation unit)
> .debug_info.dwo (one COMDAT section for each type unit)
> .debug_loclists.dwo
> .debug_line.dwo
> .debug_macro.dwo
> .debug_rnglists.dwo
> .debug_str_offsets.dwo
> .debug_str.dwo
> ...
> so that seems to confirm that the gcc output is in fact standard conformant.
>
> One problem though is that dwp, while supporting multiple .debug_types.dwo
> sections doesn't seem to support multiple debug_info.dwo sections.
>
> Likewise gdb, but that is being fixed atm. Fixing dwp shouldn't be too
> difficult though, I guess.
>
> AFAIU, both gdb and dwp in current shape wouldn't have any problems if a
> single .debug_info.dwo section would be emitted by gcc.
Ah yeah, that's pretty clear in DWARF, sorry about that. I will update my GDB
commit message to quote that (and avoid saying that it's a gcc bug :)).
