------- Additional Comments From fjahanian at apple dot com 2004-10-08 16:23 ------- But this is a regression from gcc-3.3. Also, without this patch, there is no other place which checks for a volatility of an 'asm' statement. Then why not just say in the documentation that 'volatile' has no effect on an 'asm'? BTW, thanks for preparing the patch for me.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17884
