https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121252
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2025-07-27 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yeah, our IL is a bit awkward here. Ideally we'd always have result_decl = return-value; return; // result_decl I guess a special identifier like __result might work (keep upper-case for operators).