https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122668
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2) > > It seems like we need to treat TestClass as dependentish in this context, > > perhaps just add TYPE_BEING_DEFINED to dependentish_scope_p? > Makes sense, maybe also '&& cp_noexcept_operand' since IIUC this particular > bug is specific to noexcept-specs. ... and within other parts of a function signature, we _do_ want to diagnose current-instantiation name lookup failure ahead of time.
