The build for ARC got broken inadvertently due to a typo in a patch submitted
earlier by me for lib1funcs.asm . 

This is because cmp is not a valid instruction in the ARCTangent A4.


./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/arcfsf/arc-elf32/bin/ -isystem
/usr/local/arcfsf/arc-elf32/include -isystem
/usr/local/arcfsf/arc-elf32/sys-include
-L/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfbuild/build-gcc-arc-elf32/gcc/../ld -O2  -DIN_GCC
-DCROSS_COMPILE   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include   -g 
-DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -Dinhibit_libc -I. -I.
-I/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfgcc/gcc-4.0-fresh/gcc/gcc
-I/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfgcc/gcc-4.0-fresh/gcc/gcc/.
-I/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfgcc/gcc-4.0-fresh/gcc/gcc/../include
-I/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfgcc/gcc-4.0-fresh/gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include  -DL_umulsidi3
-xassembler-with-cpp -c
/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfgcc/gcc-4.0-fresh/gcc/gcc/config/arc/lib1funcs.asm -o
libgcc/./_umulsidi3.o
/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfgcc/gcc-4.0-fresh/gcc/gcc/config/arc/lib1funcs.asm: Assembler
messages:
/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfgcc/gcc-4.0-fresh/gcc/gcc/config/arc/lib1funcs.asm:70:
Warning: ".option" directive overrides command-line (default) value
/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfgcc/gcc-4.0-fresh/gcc/gcc/config/arc/lib1funcs.asm:92: Error:
bad instruction `cmp r0,0'
make[1]: *** [libgcc/./_umulsidi3.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/tools/fsf/fsfbuild/build-gcc-arc-elf32/gcc'
make: *** [libgcc.a] Error 2

I will be submitting a patch to fix this PR shortly.

-- 
           Summary: Build broken for ARC.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,giovannibajo at libero
                    dot it,mark at codesourcery dot com
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: arc-elf32


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18263

Reply via email to