https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122753
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
Depends on| |103507, 105582, 84386,
| |114373, 119994, 39626,
| |108850
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2025-11-18
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39626
[Bug 39626] Correctly implement details of Fortran 2008 BLOCK construct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84386
[Bug 84386] Implicitly declared variables in BLOCK have scope of including
program unit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103507
[Bug 103507] ICE in resolve_block_construct, at fortran/resolve.c:10787
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105582
[Bug 105582] ICE on procedure pointer assignment inside block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108850
[Bug 108850] SELECT CASE within BLOCK construct in one subroutine prevents
compilation of another subroutine named "SELECT"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114373
[Bug 114373] [13 Regression] BLOCK construct not correctly analyzed with
-fopenmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119994
[Bug 119994] Valid specification expression in block rejected
