[Bug c++/123579] Compiler generated copy constructors use copy initialization instead of direct initialization

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123579

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Well the code works without an explicit on the copy constructor also, GCC
> does not produce a call to it; rather it is just requiring it to exist.

Well rather GCC is requiring the copy constructor not to be explicit.