https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88707
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > It would be good if someone could confirm that it now works – such that this > PR can be closed as fixed. I am monitoring results - the problem being that they have always been random fails, and so a clean set does not prove anything; I suggest that if they have not been seen for a week, it would be fair to say that they are fixed on Darwin (will report at that point).
