https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120770
Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2026-02-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |dinka.ranns at gmail dot com,
| |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I am not sure why "needs-bisection" is set - this does not appear to be a
regression.
with revised syntax - this fails on trunk (with a different point of failure)
```
template<typename T>
auto fn()
pre (T{})
{
}
int main(int, char**) {
fn<int>();
return 0;
}
```
```
<source>: In function 'auto fn() [with T = int]':
<source>:5:1: internal compiler error: in gimplify_init_constructor, at
gimplify.cc:6802
5 | }
| ^
0x295dcf8 diagnostics::context::diagnostic_impl(rich_location*,
diagnostics::metadata const*, diagnostics::option_id, char const*,
__va_list_tag (*) [1], diagnostics::kind)
???:0
0x2952a3b internal_error(char const*, ...)
???:0
0xb2142c fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*)
???:0
0x11f132a gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0x11f4bea gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
???:0
0x11f097f gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0x11f3101 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0x11f3101 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0x11f306b gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0x11f4bea gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
???:0
0x11f1e70 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0x1216096 gimplify_body(tree_node*, bool)
???:0
0x121655c gimplify_function_tree(tree_node*)
???:0
0xfcc257 cgraph_node::analyze()
???:0
0xfcf726 symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit()
???:0
```
