https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124144
Bug ID: 124144
Summary: [reflection] missing access check for reflection-name
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We should emit two errors here
```
class A {
protected:
void fn ();
int i;
};
class B : public A {
void test() {
constexpr auto r1 = ^^A::fn; // error
constexpr auto r2 = ^^A::i; // error
}
};
```
just like we would for
constexpr auto a1 = &A::fn;
constexpr auto a2 = &A::i;
r.C: In member function ‘void B::test()’:
r.C:12:33: error: ‘void A::fn()’ is protected within this context
12 | constexpr auto a1 = &A::fn; // error
| ^~
r.C:3:10: note: declared protected here
3 | void fn ();
| ^~
r.C:13:33: error: ‘int A::i’ is protected within this context
13 | constexpr auto a2 = &A::i; // error
| ^
r.C:4:9: note: declared protected here
4 | int i;
| ^
