https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124159
--- Comment #3 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Based on reported bugs, -Wdangling-pointer doesn't seem as noisy as -Wstringop-* or -Warray-bounds and they all either point to warnings on dead code or missed optimization. I personally don't like the idea of a killswitch for these warnings though; while they're noisy, they have been *very* useful. It will incorrectly encourage users to disable all warnings even if they're not problematic on their code base.
