https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120505

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2026-02-23
                 CC|                            |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED

--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For non-'-m64' testing, I'm seeing:

    +PASS: gfortran.dg/gomp/map-subarray-4.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
    +FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/map-subarray-4.f90   -O   scan-tree-dump gimple "
map\\(struct_unord:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct t\\[0:\\]
\\*\\)_[0-9]+\\] \\[len: 2\\]\\) map\\(to:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct
t\\[0:\\] \\*\\)_[0-9]+\\]\\[_[0-9]+\\]\\.den1 \\[pointer set, len: 88\\]\\)
map\\(to:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct t\\[0:\\]
\\*\\)_[0-9]+\\]\\[_[0-9]+\\]\\.den2 \\[pointer set, len: 88\\]\\) "
    +FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/map-subarray-4.f90   -O   scan-tree-dump gimple "
map\\(release:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct t\\[0:\\]
\\*\\)_[0-9]+\\]\\[_[0-9]+\\]\\.den1 \\[pointer set, len: 88\\]\\)
map\\(release:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct t\\[0:\\]
\\*\\)_[0-9]+\\]\\[_[0-9]+\\]\\.den2 \\[pointer set, len: 88\\]\\) "

For non-offloading testing, I'm seeing:

    +PASS: libgomp.fortran/map-subarray-16.f90   -O0  (test for excess errors)
    +FAIL: libgomp.fortran/map-subarray-16.f90   -O0  execution test
    [Etc.]

Reply via email to