https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120505
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2026-02-23
CC| |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For non-'-m64' testing, I'm seeing:
+PASS: gfortran.dg/gomp/map-subarray-4.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/map-subarray-4.f90 -O scan-tree-dump gimple "
map\\(struct_unord:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct t\\[0:\\]
\\*\\)_[0-9]+\\] \\[len: 2\\]\\) map\\(to:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct
t\\[0:\\] \\*\\)_[0-9]+\\]\\[_[0-9]+\\]\\.den1 \\[pointer set, len: 88\\]\\)
map\\(to:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct t\\[0:\\]
\\*\\)_[0-9]+\\]\\[_[0-9]+\\]\\.den2 \\[pointer set, len: 88\\]\\) "
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/map-subarray-4.f90 -O scan-tree-dump gimple "
map\\(release:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct t\\[0:\\]
\\*\\)_[0-9]+\\]\\[_[0-9]+\\]\\.den1 \\[pointer set, len: 88\\]\\)
map\\(release:MEM <struct t\\[0:\\]> \\[\\(struct t\\[0:\\]
\\*\\)_[0-9]+\\]\\[_[0-9]+\\]\\.den2 \\[pointer set, len: 88\\]\\) "
For non-offloading testing, I'm seeing:
+PASS: libgomp.fortran/map-subarray-16.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: libgomp.fortran/map-subarray-16.f90 -O0 execution test
[Etc.]