https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124165
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > Created attachment 63749 [details] > Try this Unoptimized with -fno-checking this gets us from thread pro- & epilogue : 99.49 ( 86%) 236k ( 0%) TOTAL : 115.04 439M 114.31user 0.34system 1:55.07elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 698488maxresident)k 0inputs+14720outputs (0major+143076minor)pagefaults 0swaps to thread pro- & epilogue : 0.12 ( 1%) 236k ( 0%) TOTAL : 13.33 439M 13.12user 0.22system 0:13.36elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 698988maxresident)k 0inputs+14816outputs (0major+127571minor)pagefaults 0swaps
